Understanding the Impact of Customer Reviews
Customer reviews have a major impact on your company's local SEO. They can make a big difference to your online visibility and how potential customers perceive your brand. This is especially important in today's digital age, where consumers increasingly rely on the opinions of others to make purchasing decisions.
Link between Customer Reviews and Local Referencing
Google, the world's most popular search engine, uses customer reviews as one of its many ranking factors. Positive reviews can increase the credibility of your business and signal to Google that your business provides a quality service, which can improve your ranking in local search results.
Customer Reviews as a Conversion Tool
In addition to referencing, customer reviews also play a significant role in converting prospects into customers. According to a study by BrightLocal, 88% of consumers trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations. As a result, a company that accumulates a large number of positive reviews can expect to see an increase in its conversion rate.
Exploiting negative reviews
It is important to bear in mind that not all reviews will be positive. However, negative reviews can also be beneficial, as they provide an opportunity to improve your service or product based on customer feedback. What's more, the way you respond to negative feedback can also influence how potential customers perceive your business.
Need a website?
Ask for a free quote!
html
The role of customer reviews in Google's local algorithm
When a user enters "plumber Bordeaux" or "afro hairdresser Paris 11 ", Google uses a specific algorithm called Vicinity Update (2021), which weights distance, relevance and awareness. Opinion signals belong to this last category: total number of opinions, frequency of publication, average rating and semantic diversity are aggregated. Since the Pigeon mutation (2014) which
has for the first time merged organic signals and "Maps" signals, the importance of reviews has continued to grow. In 2023, Whitespark's annual study ranked "Review Signals" as the third most important factor on nearly 160 criteria from the Local Packahead of traditional on-page optimisation.
A retrospective comparison between a restaurant in Nantes (205 reviews, average rating 4.7) and a direct competitor 300 metres away (27 reviews, average rating 4.9) shows that the former systematically dominates the local pack on queries such as "restaurant terrasse Nantes . Despite a slightly lower average rating, the volume and freshness of the reviews are enough to indicate to Google that the establishment is receiving real traffic, an essential point since the integration of anonymised data from Android (Popular Times).
Volume of notices, frequency and burst: why the rate counts more than the score
While many entrepreneurs focus on the average rating, Sterling Sky's research shows that the frequency with which new reviews are obtained influences the volatility of the ranking. Google seems to attribute a "freshness bonus" analogous to the Query Deserves Freshness the traditional index: a peak of 20 reviews over 30 days ("review burst") improves visibility for around 60 days, then the effect diminishes if the pace slows down.
Let's take the real-life example of an osteopathy practice in Lausanne: following an automated post-consultation email campaign via Doctolib, it obtained 47 reviews in 90 days (compared with 6 the previous year). His ranking went from 9ᵉ to 3ᵉ for "osteopath Lausanne gare . When the automation stopped, the competition gradually regained the advantage, illustrating the almost ephemeral nature of the signal. Local SEO specialists therefore recommend a continuous approach (3 to 5 reviews per month) rather than a massive one-off collection.
The semantic dimension: when reviews become user-generated content
Keywords in notice texts and co-occurrence theory
Google doesn't just extract quantitative metadata; it also analyses the linguistic substance of reviews. A Moz study reveals that the presence of terms such as "plumbing emergency" or "vegetarian brunch" in a review increases the relevance of the establishment for these "long tail" queries. This mechanism is similar to the notion of co-occurrence, where the semantic proximity between an entity (your company) and a concept (e.g. "vegan menu") is an indication of relevance.
The Spanish start-up ElTenedor (LaFourchette) has observed that restaurants receiving reviews mentioning "gluten-free" on a recurring basis climbed on the query "gluten-free restaurant Barcelona" despite the absence of this expression in the title or description of the Google Business Profile. Reviews are transformed into free "UGC" (User Generated Content) SEO content, multiplying the lexical angles without the owner having to rewrite their listing.
Watch out for E-E-A-T signals: experience, expertise, authority and reliability in reviews
Since the update of the Quality Raters guide (December 2022), the additional letter "E de Experience underlines the value of a real-life testimonial ("I ordered last night", "before/after photos"). Google considers that these signals attest to real interaction and therefore reinforce the reliability of the quotes. A growing proportion of reviews that are considered to be "thin" ("Top!" without context) could see their weight put into perspective, following the example of the devaluation of spammy backlinks.
To maximise this effect, certain hotel chains, such as Accor, now invite their travellers by e-mail to detail specific aspects (cleanliness, soundproofing, check-in flexibility) and to post photos. The aim is no longer just to get a good score, but to provide a wealth of information that will generate "experience-rich snippets" in the local pack, similar to the extracts from reviews that Google highlights ("quiet rooms", "hearty breakfast").
Comparison of review platforms: Google, Facebook, TripAdvisor, Yelp and sector niches
Direct SEO weighting versus the benefits of cross brand awareness
Google naturally prioritises hosted reviews in-house because they are natively linked to the Business Profile. However, external reviews are still relevant: Yelp feeds Siri, Apple Maps and sometimes Bing; TripAdvisor boosts a hotel's visibility via its own ranking, which is then reflected on Google thanks to the links cited (building off-site signals).
In the medical field, Doctolib in France and Zocdoc in the United States provide notes that are displayed in the Knowledge Panel via signposting <aggregateRating> schema.org, giving it a sectoral authority dimension. The case of the Berlin dentist "Zahnkultur Berlin" speaks for itself: fewer Google reviews (73) than its rival, but 280 Jameda reviews rated 1.1/5 (inverted German rating), giving it an overall improvement in its named entity on Google and a higher click-through rate (CTR) in the organic SERP.
A balanced strategy should therefore make use of Google for the direct signal, an industry platform for expertise, and Facebook/Instagram for social engagement. Each silo of reviews adds to the web of trust around the brand, a factor that Google evaluates via entity analysis (Knowledge Graph).
Detailed case studies: from a pizzeria in Lyon to a dental surgery in Montreal
Case 1: "Forza Napolitaine" pizzeria, Lyon 7ᵉ
In 2019, this artisan pizzeria had 18 reviews (4.2/5) and appeared at the bottom of the second Google Maps page on "pizza napolitaine Lyon . It has put a QR code on its takeaway boxes directing users to the Google review URL. Result: +312 reviews in 24 months. But the major turning point was the systematic response from the manager, incorporating keywords ("cornicione soufflé", "four napolitain 485 °C"); these responses are also analysed. In October 2022, it spent 1ʳᵉ on the query "pizza napolitaine Lyon 7" and saw its sales rise by +38 %.
Case 2: Dr Chen's dental practice, Montreal
Dr Chen experimented with a review gating (redirecting unhappy customers to an internal form). After Google tightened its policy in April 2020, 42 reviews were suspended. The ranking dropped from the top 3 to the top 10. By regularising (no filtering, open invitation), the average returned to 4.6/5 out of 130 reviews and the firm recovered the 2ᵉ position. This case highlights the boomerang effect of a practice contrary to the guidelines.
Case 3: "Green Chic" eco-responsible shop, Brussels
Its reviews mentioning "zero waste" and "slow fashion" helped it emerge on queries that it had not initially targeted. Online sales (click-and-collect) soared, proving that local SEO can generate hybrid e-commerce traffic.
Legal and ethical strategies for boosting notifications without penalties
Soft automation: post-purchase emails and frictionless NFC
Solutions such as Klaviyo or Mailjet allow you to send a personalised email 24 hours after delivery. A short link g.page/[alias]/review reduces friction. The addition of NFC widgets (tap & review) at the checkout has increased the rate of returned reviews from 2 % to 7 % in the Jean Marc Joubert hairdressing salon chain.
Material incentives: what is and isn't allowed
Offering a promo code in exchange for a review is not explicitly forbidden in France, but Google prohibits it if the review has to be positive. Fnac, for example, was nabbed in 2019 for a competition linked to 5-star reviews. A good practice is to offer a chance to win a gift card, regardless of the tone of the review. Transparency and equality are the guarantees of RGPD and Google Policy compliance.
Team training
Involving employees: a delivery person who can explain in 15 seconds how to leave a review increases monthly volume by a factor of 1.8. Subway USA franchises use "Did we earn 5 stars today? scripts integrated into the checkout process, proving that internal education remains an indirect upsell vector.
Managing negative reviews: from reputation to SEO benefits
A 1-star review detailing a delivery problem can become a lever for improvement if it is dealt with publicly. Google values responses within 24 hours. According to ReviewTrackers, 45 % of consumers are more likely to patronise a business that responds to negative reviews. In SEO terms, the response potentially contains keywords ("Colissimo delay", "reinforced packaging") that increase relevance on these related queries.
Example: the electronics site Techazur (Nice) transformed a complaint about a faulty graphics card into an explanation of its new QA testing process; this lengthy response (240 words) now appears in the Google results extract when "Techazur after-sales service return" is typed in, reducing buyer anxiety and improving CTR (brand sustainability).
Measuring the impact of reviews on local referencing metrics
Geolocation positioning tracking
Tools such as LocalFalcon or Surfer Local show the density of positions on a grid of points around the address. After a notice campaign, we often see an increase in the radius of visibility, known as the reach radius. The "Pain d'Hier" bakery in Toulouse went from a radius of 1.2 km to 2.8 km following +120 reviews, increasing the "customer actions" discovery in the Insights table.
Key KPIs
Impressions in the pack, telephone calls, itinerary requests and website visits. Optique Rivoli measured +22 % in calls and +14 % in itineraries over 6 months, with an acquisition cost of almost zero compared with Google Ads (CPC glasses Paris 2: €3.10).
Synergy between reviews, local backlinks and NAP citations
Reviews contribute to local awareness, but their full potential is revealed when they are combined with hyperlocal backlinks (municipal blog, chamber of commerce) and consistent NAP citations. In the "Hoppy Days" microbrewery experiment (Lille), presence on three local directories + 50 new reviews generated a multiplier effect: +64 % Google My Business sessions, compared with +25 % when each action was isolated.
The principle of "signal stacking" is comparable to the digital PR strategy: the more authentic signals point to the brand through different vectors (links, reviews, press mentions), the more the entity is consolidated in Google's semantic graph, reducing algorithmic fluctuations.
Moderation and the fight against fake reviews: SEO and legislative impacts
In Europe, the Omnibus Directive (May 2022) requires e-tailers to prove that reviews come from verified consumers. Amazon has announced that it blocked more than 200 million fake reviews in 2022. On the SEO side, an artificial influx can trigger an algorithmic filter (review spam detection): suspension of the listing, loss of positions and sometimes "Suspected notices visible" markings in Maps.
Locksmith company "Express Serrure in Paris lost 720 reviews overnight after a competitor reported a notice factory in Bangladesh. It fell from 1ʳᵉ to 18ᵉ place and only recovered its traffic after 4 months of rebuilding, demonstrating how fragile digital reputation remains.
Into the future: generative AI, voice search and multimodal advice
With the arrival of Search Generative Experience (SGE) and Bard/Gemini, Google is extracting automatic summaries of reviews, which can already be seen on "AI-powered summaries" in the United States. Common phrases ("very good value for money", "slow service") are summarised, which could reduce the visual impact of individual reviews but increase the value of the overall signal.
The rise of voice search ("Ok Google, best vegan brunch near me") reinforces the need for conversational keywords in reviews. Also, video reviews on Maps (tested in India) introduce a multimodal dimension capitalising on object detection (computer vision): a restaurant owner whose videos show appetising dishes will benefit from an additional attraction that could indirectly influence rankings via CTR.
Actionable checklist to boost your local referencing thanks to reviews
- Set up a post-purchase e-mail sequence with a direct link.
- Train front-office teams in non-intrusive solicitation.
- Respond to 100 % of reviews by naturally integrating your keywords (without stuffing).
- Diversify: Google, sector platform, main social network.
- Monitor via Google Business Profile > Insights and third-party tools.
- Avoid any practice of review gating or buying notices.
- Implement a process for managing negative reviews (SOP: response to negative reviews). < 24 h, solution, follow-up).
- Couple the advice strategy with a hyperlocal backlinks campaign.
- Update photos and videos regularly, as fresh content encourages detailed reviews.
- Anticipating generative AI: encouraging rich, authentic descriptions.
Conclusion
Customer reviews are no longer just a token of social credibility: they are a technical pillar of local referencing, interacting with algorithms, semantics, user experience and even regulations. A company that masters this lever, in an ethical and structured way, gains positions, clicks and, ultimately, sales. In a landscape where Google values experience, every authentic testimonial becomes an SEO micro-content, and every interaction an additional building block towards lasting visibility.
